Dave LewisD2.3 - Architectural Approaches ReportDave.Lewis@cs.tcd.ie
This document reviews from a WP2 perspective the whitepapers produced in the M-Zones
programme at the end of June 2004 and forms part of the programme’s research quality
assurance process.
The overall goal of the quality assessment process conducted collectively by WP2, 3 and 4 is
to provide a mechanism for incrementally improving the quality of the research work
conducted in M-Zones. This is performed by guiding the development of a set of research
whitepapers towards completion for each co-released WP2, WP3 and WP4 deliverable. This
guidance complements that of individual supervisors of researchers, but also through
collective peer review of papers, which aims to assess and improve the quality of the resulting
research.
WP2 is primarily concerned with ensuring that all research work has a clear statement of its
assumptions and context, thus providing a high level architectural view of the research from a
number of viewpoints, i.e. the business viewpoint, the logical/structural viewpoint, the
technology viewpoint and the reuse viewpoint. These viewpoints remain unchanged from
D1.2 and are included in Annex 1 for reference, with the specific assessment criteria used,
which is also unchanged, included in Annex 2. Section 2 presents the overall results and
observations from the assessment of the whitepaper submitted with this deliverable. As some
of the white papers are continuations of work reviewed for WP2 in D2.1, only reference of
relevant changes will be made to avoid repetition between deliverables. Section 3 presents a
current synthesis of the work in the whitepapers on requirements and research context. This is
not an attempt to define an overall view of M-Zone’s concepts, but aims to provide a concise
feel of the direction in which the research, as represented by this set of white papers, is
progressing, again only as a delta on the synthesis already presented in deliverable D2.3. It
should not therefore be interpreted as definitive or prescriptive, but as an aid to an
understanding of the project’s overall requirements and research context and to assist
individual researchers within the project in identifying further potential synergies.
|